14 months of Rúben Amorim: 14 Reasons Behind Man United’s Decision

Manchester United have dismissed Rúben Amorim after 14 months in charge. The decision followed a prolonged internal review that cited a mix of on-pitch failure, tactical stagnation, and irreparable off-field breakdowns. Club sources outline the following 14 key reasons behind the move:

1. Worst league performance in decades
   United recorded their poorest league form since the 1970s, triggering alarm at board level.

2. Failure to reach the Champions League
   The club fell well short of top-four expectations and never mounted a genuine title challenge.

3. Rigid tactical system
   Amorim persisted with his preferred 3-4-3 / 3-4-2-1, regardless of opposition or personnel.

4. Lack of tactical adaptation
   Injuries and squad limitations failed to prompt meaningful structural changes.

5. Stagnation after initial stability
   Early defensive improvement gave way to predictable patterns and declining performances.

6. Emotional and erratic leadership style
   Senior figures grew concerned over inconsistent decision-making and touchline behavior.

7. Explosive press conference
   Public criticism of the scouting department and references to sporting director Jason Wilcox crossed internal red lines.

8. Public hints about poor transfer backing
   Amorim’s cryptic media comments were viewed as undermining the club’s hierarchy.

9. No January reinforcements
   His request for an experienced Premier League striker was rejected, escalating frustration.

10. Breakdown with CEO Omar Berrada
    Communication between the manager and executive leadership reportedly collapsed.

11. Power struggle with sporting director
    The Amorim–Wilcox relationship was deemed “untenable” by senior decision-makers.

12. Thin squad exposed by absences
    AFCON departures and injuries to key players severely weakened the team.

13. Questionable personnel decisions
    Continued reliance on underperforming figures, including Bruno Fernandes, alienated fans.

14. No clear long-term progress
    After more than a year, the board saw no evidence of tactical evolution or sustainable identity.