There is a particular flavour of Brazilian discomfort that has nothing to do with results and everything to do with manner, and it was on full display for the best part of an hour in Houston. Japan, set up in a compact 5-4-1 that conceded territory without conceding panic, gave Carlo Ancelotti’s side the one thing his football does not actually want: the ball, in abundance, without a plan for what to do with it.
This is the paradox that has trailed Brazil through the group stage and now into the knockouts. They are happiest, tactically, playing through structured opposition with the spaces that a mid-block invites; they are at their most uncomfortable when an opponent simply declines to engage, daring them to solve a problem rather than exploit one. Japan understood this and built their afternoon around it.
The opening goal, when it came, owed nothing to Japan’s patience and everything to Brazil’s oldest failing: a misplaced pass under no great pressure. Danilo, so often the source of these moments in a Brazil shirt, gave the ball away in midfield; Sano, alert to the gift, went past a flat-footed Casemiro and drove a finish in from range. It was the kind of goal that does not appear in any tactical plan, Japan’s or Brazil’s, and yet it is exactly the kind of goal that tends to find Brazilian sides built around ageing legs in midfield. Casemiro’s recovery pace has been a known quantity for some time now; it simply chose this particular afternoon to be exposed in front of a watching world.
What followed was instructive less for what Ancelotti changed than for what he refused to change. Paquetá’s withdrawal at the interval was forced by injury rather than tactics, but it had the effect of a selectorial mercy killing: a player who had cut an increasingly anxious figure against Japan’s pressing triggers was replaced, and the team that emerged for the second half looked, by increments, more like itself. Endrick’s introduction stretched a defensive line that had spent forty-five minutes barely needing to move; Bruno Guimarães, the one midfielder who had looked equal to the day’s specific demands, began to dictate from deeper.
The equaliser, when it arrived, was a small vindication of an old managerial principle: that faith, applied to the right player at the right moment, is not sentimentality but good management. Casemiro had already gone close, his header cannoning around the goal-line off both post and goalkeeper without crossing it, and there will have been coaches who used that near-miss as license to withdraw him rather than persist. Ancelotti did not. Two minutes later, the centre-back Gabriel Magalhães supplied a cross from the left and Casemiro, restored to something like his old conviction, headed it home. It is worth pausing on the shape of that sentence: a centre-back providing the cross, a defensive midfielder providing the finish. This was not, by any reasonable definition, an aesthetically fluent Brazilian goal. It was, instead, a goal of the kind Brazil have not traditionally needed to manufacture, and the fact that they could manufacture it at all may be the more significant detail.
The winner, deep into stoppage time, told a similar story from a different angle. Guimarães, with the ball at his feet on the edge of the box and a sight of goal available to him, chose instead to lay it off to Martinelli, who had been on the pitch barely half an hour. It was a decision that flattered both men: Guimarães for the football intelligence to trust the pass over the obvious individual option, and Martinelli for the composure to open his body and finish first time past Suzuki rather than rush the chance his introduction had been waiting for all match. Japan, who according to their own recent World Cup history have now led and lost three consecutive knockout matches, will recognise the shape of this kind of evening rather too well.
On set pieces, the picture is murkier than a tidy verdict would like. What’s known is that Brazil’s first half was short on attacking territory generally, and that the one notable dead-ball moment of the match actually ran the other way, with Japan briefly unsettled by a Guimarães set piece around the tenth minute rather than Brazil profiting from one of their own. Whether that reflects a genuine deficiency in Brazil’s routines, or simply a side that spent long spells failing to get into the areas from which corners and free-kicks are won, isn’t something this single match settles. It’s a question worth holding rather than answering.
Ancelotti’s own postmatch reckoning was admirably free of euphoria. He called it Brazil’s most complete performance of the tournament, which says less about Monday’s evening than about everything that preceded it, and he was honest enough to identify the issue that this victory papered over rather than solved: a habit of starting slowly that, against sterner opposition in the rounds ahead, will not always be rescued by a player arriving from the bench in the ninetieth minute. Brazil have, for now, the talent on their bench to make that habit survivable. Whether it remains survivable against Ivory Coast or Norway, and beyond, is the question this performance leaves only partially answered.
Read more – Brazil survive Japan scare to book Round of 16 berth
Also see – Four games at the knife-edge: The knock-outs start with a bang
Follow Footy Times on Social Media:
Facebook | Instagram | Twitter | YouTube
Discover more from Footy Times
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.